Approaches that require scientists to become benchtop artisans that rely on intensive, irreproducible manual labor to establish "complex models" has yielded a scalability and reproducibility crisis. It limits throughput to only a few dozen tissues at a time — whose results are difficult to trust, and too limited to meaningfully progress a discovery pipeline.

We experiment on 10,000+ human tissues of various types simultaneously, with zero human intervention. This allows us to test on 1,000's of unique experimental conditions — each with different tissue types, donors, combo treatments, multiphase regimens, and an array of endpoints, all executed with robotic precision.

The intricate nature of animal-study procedures introduces variability between the dozens of technicians and readouts involved. Billions of dollars and entire therapeutic thrusts rely on results produced by vivarium staff facing ethical burnout and the inescapable variability of procedures like creating double-humanized mice. Is this truly the best we have, or can we do better?

We observe remarkable consistency despite the complexity of our models because each unique tissue is handled and measured exactly the same way, with the exact same timings, from start to finish in our fully automated process. The tireless precision and superhuman “lab hands” of our robots overcome the latent variability produced by differences in manual techniques and skill.